CT Cervical Spine - CAM 705

(Combination requests at end of the document)

For evaluation of neurologic deficits when Cervical Spine MRI is contraindicated or inappropriate
(Acharya, 2019; ACR, 2013; NASS, 2010; Teoli, 2021)

  • With any of the following new neurological deficits documented on physical exam
  • Extremity muscular weakness
  • Pathologic (e.g., Babinski, Lhermitte's sign, Chaddock Sign, Hoffman’s) or abnormal reflexes
  • Absent/decreased sensory changes along a particular cervical dermatome (nerve distribution): pin prick, touch, vibration, proprioception, or temperature
  • Upper or lower extremity increase muscle tone/spasticity
  • New onset bowel or bladder dysfunction (e.g., retention or incontinence)
  • Gait abnormalities (see Table 1 below for more details)
  • Suspected cord compression with any neurological deficits as listed above.

For evaluation of neck pain with any of the following when Cervical Spine MRI is contraindicated
(Allegri, 2016)

  • With new or worsening objective neurologic deficits on exam, as above
  • Failure of conservative treatment* for at least six (6) weeks within the last six (6) months (ACR, 2013; Eubanks, 2010)
  • With progression or worsening of symptoms during the course of conservative treatment*
  • With an abnormal electromyography (EMG) or nerve conduction study (if performed) indicating a cervical radiculopathy. (EMG is not recommended to determine the cause of axial lumbar, thoracic, or cervical spine pain (NASS, 2013))
  • Isolated neck pain in pediatric population (ACR, 2016) – conservative care not required if red flags present (see combination request below thoracic and lumbar spine may also be indicated)
    • Red flags that prompt imaging should include the presence of: age 5 or younger, constant pain, pain lasting >4 weeks, abnormal neurologic examination, early morning stiffness and/or gelling; night pain that prevents or disrupts sleep; radicular pain; fever; weight loss; malaise; postural changes (e.g., kyphosis or scoliosis); and limp (or refusal to walk in a younger child <5yo) AND initial radiographs have been performed (Bernstein, 2007; Feldman, 2006)
    • Neck pain associated with suspected inflammation, infection, or malignancy 

As part of initial post-operative/procedural evaluation ("CT best examination to assess for hardware complication, extent of fusion" (ACR, 2015; Rao, 2018) and MRI for cord, nerve root compression, disc pathology, or post-op infection)  

Note: If ordered by Neurosurgeon or orthopedic surgeon for purposes of surgical planning, a contraindication to MRI is not required. 

  • For preoperative evaluation/planning
  • CT discogram
  • CSF leak highly suspected and supported by patient history and/or physical exam findings (leak (known or suspected spontaneous (idiopathic) intracranial hypotension (SIH), post lumbar puncture headache, post spinal surgery headache, orthostatic headache, rhinorrhea or otorrhea, or cerebrospinal-venous fistula -preferred exam CT myelogram) (Starling, 2013)
  • A follow-up study may be needed to help evaluate a patient’s progress after treatment, procedure, intervention, or surgery in the last 6 months. Documentation requires a medical reason that clearly indicates why additional imaging is needed for the type and area(s) requested (routine surveillance post-op not indicated without symptoms)
  • Changing neurologic status post-operatively
  • Surgical infection as evidenced by signs/symptoms, laboratory, or prior imaging findings
  • Residual or new neurological deficits or symptoms (Rao, 2018)- see neurological deficit section above.
  • When combo requests are submitted (i.e., MRI and CT of the spine), the office notes should clearly document the need for both studies to be done simultaneously (e.g., the need for both soft tissue and bony anatomy is required) (Fisher, 2013)
    • Combination requests where both cervical spine CT and MRI cervical spine are both approvable (not an all-inclusive list):
      • OPLL (Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament) (Choi, 2011)
      • Pathologic or complex fractures
      • Malignant process of spine with both bony and soft tissue involvement
      • Unstable craniocervical junction
      • Clearly documented indication for bony and soft tissue abnormality where assessment will change management for the patient

For evaluation of suspected myelopathy when Cervical Spine MRI is contraindicated
(ACR, 2015; Behrbalk, 2013; Davies, 2018; Vilaca, 2016; Waly, 2017)

  • Does NOT require conservative care
  • Progressive symptoms including hand clumsiness, worsening handwriting, difficulty with grasping and holding objects, diffuse numbness in the hands, pins and needles sensation, increasing difficulty with balance and ambulation  
  • Any of the neurological deficits as noted above  

For evaluation of trauma or acute injury
(ACR, 2018)

  • Presents with any of the following neurological deficits as above
  •  With progression or worsening of symptoms during the course of conservative treatment*
  • History of underlying spinal abnormalities (i.e., ankylosing spondylitis), both MRI and CT are approvable (ACR, 2021; Koivikko, 2008)
  • When the patient is clinically unevaluable or there are preliminary imaging findings (x-ray or CT) needing further evaluation
  • When office notes specify the patient meets NEXUS (National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study) or CCR (Canadian Cervical Rules) criteria for imaging (ACR, 2018):
    • CT for initial imaging
    • MRI when suspect spinal cord or nerve root injury or when patient is obtunded, and CT is negative
    • CT or MRI for treatment planning of unstable spine

(“MRI and CT provide complementary information. When indicated it is appropriate to perform both examinations” (ACR, 2018))

For evaluation of known fracture or known/new compression fractures
(ACR, 2018)

  • To assess union of a fracture when physical examination, plain radiographs, or prior imaging suggest delayed or non-healing
  • To determine the position of fracture fragments
  • With history of malignancy (if MRI is contraindicated or cannot be performed)
  • With an associated new focal neurologic deficit as above (Alexandru, 2012)
  • Prior to a planned surgery/intervention or if the results of the CT will change management

CT myelogram is indicated when signs and symptoms are incongruent with MRI findings or MRI cannot be performed/contraindicated/surgeon preference
(Grams, 2010; Morita, 2011; Naganawa, 2011; NASS, 2012; Ozdoba; 2011; Starling, 2013)

  • Demonstration of the site of a CSF leak (known or suspected spontaneous (idiopathic) intracranial hypotension (SIH), post lumbar puncture headache, post spinal surgery headache, orthostatic headache, rhinorrhea or otorrhea, or cerebrospinal-venous fistula)
  • Surgical planning, especially regarding to the nerve roots or evaluation of dural sac
  • Evaluation of suspected brachial plexus or nerve root injury in the neonate

For evaluation tumor, cancer, or metastasis with any of the following (MRI is usually the preferred study- CT may be needed to further characterize solitary indeterminate lesions seen on MRI)
(ACR, 2108; Kim, 2012; Roberts, 2010)
Primary tumor

  • Initial staging or re-staging of a known primary spinal tumor
  • Known spinal tumor with new signs or symptoms (e.g., new or increasing nontraumatic pain, physical, laboratory, and/or imaging findings)
  • With an associated new focal neurologic deficit as above (Alexandru, 2012)  

Metastatic tumor

  • With evidence of metastasis on bone scan needing further clarification OR inconclusive findings on a prior imaging exam
  • Known malignancy with new signs or symptoms (e.g., new or increasing nontraumatic pain, physical, laboratory, and/or imaging findings) in a tumor that tends to metastasize to the spine
  • With an associated new focal neurologic deficit (Alexandru, 2012)
  • Initial imaging of new or increasing non-traumatic neck pain or radiculopathy or neck pain that occurs at night and wakes the patient from sleep with known active cancer and a tumor that tends to metastasize to the spine (ACR, 2018; Ziu, 2019)

For evaluation of inconclusive/indeterminate finding on prior imaging that requires further clarification

  • One follow-up exam to ensure no suspicious change has occurred in prior imaging finding. No further surveillance unless specified as highly suspicious or change was found on last follow-up exam. When MRI cannot be performed, is contraindicated, or CT is preferred to characterize the finding (ACR, 2018)

Indication for combination studies for the initial pre-therapy staging of cancer, OR active monitoring for recurrence as clinically indicated OR evaluation of suspected metastases

  • < 5 concurrent studies to include CT or MRI of any of the following areas as appropriate depending on the cancer: Neck, Abdomen, Pelvis, Chest, Brain, Cervical Spine, Thoracic Spine, or Lumbar Spine

For evaluation of known or suspected infection/abscess when Cervical Spine MRI is contraindicated
(ACR, 2018)

  • As evidenced by signs and/or symptoms, laboratory (i.e., abnormal white blood cell count, ESR and/or CRP) or prior imaging findings (Bond, 2016)
  • Follow-up imaging of infection
    • With worsening symptoms/laboratory values (i.e., white blood cell count, ESR/CRP) or radiographic findings (Berbari, 2015)

For evaluation of known or suspected inflammatory disease or atlantoaxial instability when MRI is contraindicated or for surgical treatment planning:

  • In rheumatoid arthritis with neurologic signs/symptoms, or evidence of subluxation on radiographs (lateral radiograph in flexion and neutral should be the initial study) (Colebatch, 2013; Tehranzadeh, 2017)
    • Patients with negative radiographs but symptoms suggestive of cervical instability or in patients with neurologic deficits
  • High-risk disorders affecting the atlantoaxial articulation, such as Down syndrome, Marfan syndrome with neurological signs/symptoms, abnormal neurological exam, or evidence of abnormal or inconclusive radiographs of the cervical spine (Henderson, 2017)
  • Spondyloarthropathies, known or suspected 
  • Ankylosing Spondylitis/Spondyloarthropathies with non-diagnostic or indeterminate x-ray and appropriate rheumatology workup 

For evaluation of spine abnormalities related to immune system suppression, e.g., HIV, chemotherapy, leukemia, or lymphoma when Cervical Spine MRI is contraindicated
(ACR, 2015; Nagashima, 2010)

  • As evidenced by signs/symptoms, laboratory, or prior imaging findings

Other Indications for a Cervical Spine CT, when MRI is contraindicated or cannot be performed
(Note- See combination requests, below, for initial advanced imaging assessment and pre-operatively)

  • Tethered cord or spinal dysraphism (known or suspected), based on preliminary imaging, neurological exam, and/or high-risk cutaneous stigmata (AANS, 2019; Duz, 2008; Milhorat, 2009)
  • Known Arnold-Chiari syndrome- (For initial imaging see combination below)
    • Known Chiari I malformation without syrinx or hydrocephalus, follow-up imaging after initial diagnosis with new or changing signs/symptoms or exam findings consistent with spinal cord pathology (Hitson, 2015)
    • Known Chiari II (Arnold-Chiari syndrome), III, or IV malformation
    • Achondroplasia (one Cervical Spine MRI to assess the craniocervical junction, as early as possible (even in asymptomatic cases) (Legare, 2020; White, 2016)
  • Syrinx or syringomyelia (known or suspected)
    • With neurologic findings and/or predisposing conditions (e.g., Chiari malformation, prior trauma, neoplasm, arachnoiditis, severe spondylosis (Timpone, 2015)),
    • To further characterize a suspicious abnormality seen on prior imaging
    • Known syrinx with new/worsening symptoms
  • Toe walking in a child when associated with upper motor neuron signs, including hyperreflexia, spasticity; or orthopedic deformity with concern for spinal cord pathology (e.g., pes cavus, clawed toes, leg or foot length deformity (excluding tight heel cords))


Indications for combination studies: (ACR, 2017, 2019) - For approved indications as noted below and being performed in a child under 8 years of age who will need anesthesia for the procedure

Brain CT/Cervical CT

  • For evaluation of known Arnold-Chiari Malformation

Any combination of Cervical and/or Thoracic and/or Lumbar CTs:

  • Any combination of these studies for:
    • Scoliosis survey in infant/child with congenital scoliosis or juvenile idiopathic scoliosis under the age of 10 (ACR, 2018; SRS, 2019; Strahle, 2015).
    • In the presence of neurological deficit, progressive spinal deformity, or for preoperative planning (Trenga, 2016)
    • Neck pain and vertebral anomalies (hemivertebrae, hypoplasia, agenesis, butterfly, segmentation defect, bars, or congenital wedging) in a child on preliminary imaging.
    • Scoliosis with any of the following (Ozturk, 2010):
      • Progressive spinal deformity;
      • Neurologic deficit;
      • Early onset;
      • Atypical curve (e.g., short segment, >30’ kyphosis, left thoracic curve, associated organ anomalies);
      • Pre-operative planning; OR
      • When office notes clearly document how imaging will change management
  • Arnold Chiari I (Radic, 2018; Strahle, 2011)
    • For evaluation of spinal abnormalities associated with initial diagnosis of Arnold-Chiari Malformation. (C/T/L spine due to association with tethered cord and syringomyelia), and initial imaging has not been completed (Milhorat, 2009; Strahle, 2015)
  • Arnold Chiari II-IV
    • For initial evaluation and follow-up as appropriate
  • Tethered cord, or spinal dysraphism (known or suspected) based on preliminary imaging, neurological exam, and/or high-risk cutaneous stigmata (AANS, 2019; Duz, 2008; Milhorat, 2009), when anesthesia required for imaging (Hertzler, 2010)
  • Toe walking in a child when associated with upper motor neuron signs including hyperreflexia, spasticity; or orthopedic deformity with concern for spinal cord pathology (e.g., pes cavus, clawed toes, leg or foot length deformity (excluding tight heel cords))
  • Neck pain in a child with any of the following red flags (conservative care not required when red flags present):
    • Red flags that prompt imaging should include the presence of: age 5 or younger, constant pain, pain lasting >4 weeks, abnormal neurologic examination, early morning stiffness and/or gelling; night pain that prevents or disrupts sleep; radicular pain; fever; weight loss; malaise; postural changes (e.g., kyphosis or scoliosis); and limp (or refusal to walk in a younger child <5yo) AND initial radiographs have been performed (Bernstein, 2007; Feldman, 2006)
  • Drop metastasis from brain or spine (imaging also includes brain; CT spine imaging in this scenario is usually CT myelogram)
  • Suspected leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) (Shah, 2011)
  • Any combination of these for spinal survey in patient with metastases
  • Tumor evaluation and monitoring in neurocutaneous syndromes - See Background
  • CSF leak highly suspected and supported by patient history and/or physical exam findings (leak (known or suspected spontaneous (idiopathic) intracranial hypotension (SIH), post lumbar puncture headache, post spinal surgery headache, orthostatic headache, rhinorrhea or otorrhea, or cerebrospinal-venous fistula -preferred exam CT myelogram) (Starling, 2013)
  • CT myelogram when meets above guidelines and MRI is contraindicated or for surgical planning
  • Post-procedure (discogram) CT

Computed tomography (CT) is performed for the evaluation of the cervical spine. CT may be used as the primary imaging modality, or it may complement other modalities. Primary indications for CT include conditions, e.g., traumatic, neoplastic, and infectious. CT is often used to study the cervical spine for conditions such as degenerative disc disease when MRI is contraindicated. CT provides excellent depiction of bone detail and is used in the evaluation of known fractures of the cervical spine and for evaluation of postoperative patients.

*Conservative Therapy: (Spine) should include a multimodality approach consisting of a combination of active and inactive components. Inactive components such as rest, ice, heat, modified activities, medical devices, acupuncture and/or stimulators, medications, injections (epidural, facet, bursal, and/or joint, not including trigger point), and diathermy can be utilized. Active modalities may consist of physical therapy, a physician-supervised home exercise program**, and/or osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMT) or chiropractic care when considered safe and appropriate.

**Home Exercise Program - (HEP)/ Therapy – the following elements are required to meet guidelines for completion of conservative therapy (ACR, 2015; Last, 2009):

  • Information provided on exercise prescription/plan AND
  • Follow-up with member with documentation provided regarding lack of improvement (failed) after completion of HEP (after suitable 6-week period), or inability to complete HEP due to physical reason- i.e., increased pain, inability to physically perform exercises. (Patient inconvenience or noncompliance without explanation does not constitute “inability to complete” HEP).
  • Dates and duration of failed PT, physician-supervised HEP, or chiropractic treatment should be documented in the original office notes or an addendum to the notes.

Infection, Abscess, or Inflammatory Disease

  • Most common site is the lumbar spine (58%), followed by the thoracic spine (30%) and the cervical spine (11%) (Graeber, 2019)
  • High risk populations (indwelling hardware, history of endocarditis, IVDA, recent procedures) with appropriate signs/symptoms

Table 1: Gait and spine imaging



Work up/Imaging 


 Spastic unilateral, circumduction

Brain and/or, Cervical spine imaging based on associated symptoms 


 Spastic bilateral, circumduction

Brain, Cervical and Thoracic Spine imaging


Wide based, stiff, unsteady

Cervical and/or Thoracic spine MRI based on associated symptoms


Broad based, clumsy, staggering, lack of coordination, usually also with limb ataxia

Brain imaging


Magnetic, shuffling, difficulty initiating

Brain imaging


Stooped, small steps, rigid, turning en bloc, decreased arm swing

Brain Imaging


Irregular, jerky, involuntary movements

Medication review, consider brain imaging as per movement disorder Brain MR guidelines

Sensory ataxic

Cautious, stomping, worsening without visual input (ie + Romberg)

EMG, blood work, consider spinal (cervical or thoracic cord imaging) imaging based on EMG


Steppage, dragging of toes

EMGfoot drop Lumbar spine MRI
Pelvis MR appropriate evidence of plexopathy


Insecure, veer to one side, worse when eyes closed, vertigo

Consider Brain/IAC MRI as per GL

(References: Chhetri, 2014; Clinch, 2021; Gait, 2021; Haynes, 2018; Marshall, 2012; Pirker, 2017)

Myelopathy: Symptom severity varies, and a high index of suspicion is essential for making the proper diagnosis in early cases. Symptoms of pain and radiculopathy may not be present. The natural history of myelopathy is characterized by neurological deterioration. The most frequently encountered symptom is gait abnormality (86%) followed by increased muscular reflexes (79.1%), pathological reflexes (65.1%), paresthesia of upper limb (69.8%) and pain (67.4%) (Vilaca, 2016).

CT and Infection of the spine- Infection of the spine is not easy to differentiate from other spinal disorders, e.g., degenerative disease, spinal neoplasms, and non-infective inflammatory lesions. Infections may affect different parts of the spine, e.g., vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and paraspinal tissues. Imaging is important to obtain early diagnosis and treatment to avoid permanent neurologic deficits. When MRI is contraindicated, CT may be used to evaluate infections of the spine.

CT and Degenerative Disc DiseaseDegenerative disc disease is very common, and CT may be indicated when MRI is contraindicated, when chronic degenerative changes are accompanied by conditions, e.g., new neurological deficits; onset of joint tenderness of a localized area of the spine; new abnormal nerve conductions studies; exacerbation of chronic neck or back pain unresponsive to conservative treatment; and unsuccessful physical therapy/home exercise program.

Ossification Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL) (Choi, 2011) - Most common in cervical spine (rare but more severe in thoracic spine).

Table 2: MRI and Cutaneous Stigmata (Dias, 2015)

Risk Stratification for Various Cutaneous Markers 

High Risk

Intermediate Risk

Low Risk


Infantile hemangioma

Artretic meningocele


Subcutaneous lipoma

Caudal appendage

Segmental hemangiomas in association with LUMBAR‡ syndrome

Capillary malformations (also referred to as NFS or salmon patch when pink and poorly defined or PWS when darker red and well-defined)

Coccygeal dimple

Light hair

Isolated café au lait spots

Mongolian spots

Hypo- and hypermelanotic macules or papules

Deviated or forked gluteal cleft

Nonmidline lesions

LUMBAR, lower body hemangioma and other cutaneous defects, urogenital abnormalities, ulcerations, myelopathy, bony defects, anorectal malformations, arterial anomalies, and renal anomalies.

Back Pain with Cancer History- Radiographic (x-ray) examination should be performed in cases of back pain when a patient has a cancer history, but without known active cancer or a tumor that tends to metastasize to the spine. This can make a diagnosis in many cases. This may occasionally allow for selection of bone scan in lieu of MRI in some cases. When radiographs do not answer the clinical question, then MRI may be appropriate after a consideration of conservative care.

Neoplasms causing VCF (vertebral compression fractures) include primary bone neoplasms, such as hemangioma or giant cell tumors, and tumor-like conditions causing bony and cellular remodeling, such as aneurysmal bone cysts, or Paget’s disease (osteitis deformans); infiltrative neoplasms, including and not limited to, multiple myeloma and lymphoma, and metastatic neoplasms (ACR, 2018).

Most common spine metastasis involving primary metastasis originate from the following tumors in descending order: breast (21%), lung (19%), prostate (7.5%), renal (5%), gastrointestinal (4.5%), and thyroid (2.5%). While all tumors can seed to the spine, the cancers mentioned above metastasize to the spinal column early in the disease process (Ziu, 2019). 

Cervical Spine Trauma Imaging (ACR, 2018): The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) and the Canadian Cervical Rules (CCR) represent clinical criteria used to help determine the presence of significant cervical spine injury. Although the criteria are highly sensitive (99.6% for NEXUS), specificity is low (12.9% for Nexus).

A patient not meeting any of the NEXUS criteria of focal neurologic deficit, midline spinal tenderness, altered consciousness, intoxication or distracting injury is unlikely to have a significant cervical spine injury. Imaging evaluation of the cervical spine in these patients is not necessary. In the CCR criteria, a patient without any high risk factors (Age >65 years; paresthesias in extremities; dangerous mechanism; falls from ≥3 feet/5 stairs; axial load to head; motor vehicle crash with high speed, rollover, or ejection; bicycle collision; motorized recreational vehicle accident) is next evaluated for low risk factors (simple rear-end motor vehicle crash, patient in sitting position in emergency center, patient ambulatory at any time after trauma, delayed onset of neck pain, absence of midline cervical spine tenderness). If the patient meets a low risk criteria, they are asked to move their head 45 degrees from midline in both directions. If the patient can accomplish this, the spine is cleared and imaging is not necessary.

CT Myelogram
Myelography is the instillation of intrathecal contrast media under fluoroscopy. Patients are then imaged with CT to evaluate for spinal canal pathology. Although this technique has diminished greatly due to the advent of MRI due to its non-invasiveness and superior soft-tissue contrast, myelography is still a useful technique for conventional indications, such as spinal stenosis, when MRI is contraindicated or nondiagnostic, brachial plexus injury in neonates, radiation therapy treatment planning, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (ACR, 2019; Pomerantz, 2016).


  1. Acharya AB, Fowler JB. Chaddock Reflex. Updated 2019 Dec 15. In: StatPearls (Internet). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan.
  2. Alexandru D. Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures. Perm J. Published online October 30, 2012. 16(4):46-51. doi:10.7812/TPP/12-037.
  3. Allegri M, Montella S, Salici F, et al. Mechanisms of low back pain: A guide for diagnosis and therapy. F1000Res. 2016 Jun 28; 5:F1000 Faculty Rev-1530. doi:10.12688/f1000research.8105.2.
  4. American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS). Tethered spinal cord syndrome. 2019.
  5. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. ACR-ASNR-SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Myelography and Cisternography. Revised 2019.
  6. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Appropriateness-Criteria/Diagnostic. Published 2015.
  7. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Cervical Neck Pain or Cervical Radiculopathy. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69426/Narrative/. Revised 2018.
  8. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Inflammatory Back Pain: Known or Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/3094107/Narrative/. Revised 2021.
  9. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Suspected Spine Trauma. 2018.
  10. Behrbalk E, Salame K, Regev GJ, et al. Delayed diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by primary care physicians. Neurosurg Focus. July 2013; 35(1):1-6.
  11. Berbari EF, Kanj SS, Kowalski TJ, et al. 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 15; 61(6):e26-46.
  12. Bernstein RM, Cozen H. Evaluation of back pain in children and adolescents. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(11):1669-1676.
  13. Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: A review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 1614328.
  14. Chhetri SK, Gow D, Shaunak S, Varma A. Clinical assessment of the sensory ataxias; diagnostic algorithm with illustrative cases.Pract Neurol. 2014;14(4):242-251. doi:10.1136/practneurol-2013-000764.
  15. Choi BW, Song KJ, Chang H. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A review of literature. Asian Spine J. 2011; 5(4):267–276. doi:10.4184/asj.2011.5.4.267.
  16. Clinch J, Wood M, Driscoll S. Evaluation of gait disorders in children. BMJ Best Practice. Published February 23, 2021. Accessed July 14, 2021. https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-us/709.
  17. Colebatch AN, Edwards CJ, Østergaard M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun; 72(6):804-14.
  18. D’ Alessandro D. Does This Sacral Dimple Need to be Evaluated? PediatricEducation.org™. Iowa City, IA: July 20, 2009. https://pediatriceducation.org/2009/07/20/does-this-sacral-dimple-need-to-be-evaluated/. Retrieved March 29, 2018.
  19. Davies BM, Mowforth OD, Smith EK, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy. BMJ. 2018; 360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k186.
  20. Dias M, Partington M. Congenital brain and spinal cord malformations and their associated cutaneous markers. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(4):e1105-19.
  21. Duz B, Gocmen S, Secer HI, et al. Tethered cord syndrome in adulthood. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008; 31(3):272-278. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2565560/. Retrieved March 29, 2018.
  22. Eubanks JD. Cervical radiculopathy: Nonoperative management of neck pain and radicular symptoms. Am Fam Physician. 2010 Jan 1; 81(1):33-40. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/0101/p33.pdf.
  23. Feldman DS, Straight JJ, Badra MI, Mohaideen A, Madan SS. Evaluation of an algorithmic approach to pediatric back pain. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(3):353-357. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000214928.25809.f9.
  24. Fisher BM, Cowles S, Matulich JR, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging in addition to a computed tomographic scan necessary to identify clinically significant cervical spine injuries in obtunded blunt trauma patients? Am J Surg. 2013 Dec; 206(6):987-93; discussion 993-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
  25. Gait abnormalities. Stanford Medicine 25. Published 2021. Accessed July 14, 2021. https://stanfordmedicine25.stanford.edu/the25/gait.html.
  26. Graeber A, Cecava ND. Vertebral Osteomyelitis. [Updated 2019 Jun 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan.
  27. Haynes KB, Wimberly RL, VanPelt JM, Jo C-H, Riccio AI, Delgado MR. Toe walking: A neurological perspective after referral from pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2018;38(3):152-156. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001115.
  28. Henderson Sr FC, Austin C, Benzel E, et al. Neurological and spinal manifestations of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genetics. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
  29. Hertzler DA, DePowell JJ, Stevenson CB, Mangano FT. Tethered cord syndrome: A review of the literature from embryology to adult presentation. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(1):E1. doi:10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1079.
  30. Hitson WJ, Lane JR, Bauer DF, et al. A prospective natural history study of nonoperatively managed Chiari I malformation: Does follow-up MRI surveillance alter surgical decision making? J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Aug; 16(2):159-66.
  31. Kim YS, Han IH, Lee IS, et al. Imaging findings of solitary spinal bony lesions and the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. August 2012; 52(2): 126-132. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3467370/. Retrieved March 29, 2018.
  32. Koivikko MP, Koskinen SK. MRI of cervical spine injuries complicating ankylosing spondylitis. Skeletal Radiol. 2008 Sep; 37(9):813-9. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
  33. Last AR, Hulbert K. Chronic low back pain: Evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2009; 79(12):1067-74.
  34. Legare JM. Achondroplasia. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., eds. GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle; 1993. Accessed July 16, 2021. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1152/ [Updated August 6, 2020].
  35. Marshall FJ. Approach to the elderly patient with gait disturbance. Neurol Clin Pract. 2012;2(2):103-111. doi:10.1212/CPJ.0b013e31825a7823.
  36. Milhorat TH, Bolognese PA, Nishikawa M, et al. Association of Chiari malformation type I and tethered cord syndrome: preliminary results of sectioning filum terminale. Surg Neurol. July 2009; 72(1):20-35. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/19559924.
  37. Nagashima H, Yamane K, Nishi T, et al. Recent trends in spinal infections: Retrospective analysis of patients treated during the past 50 years. Int Orthop. March 2010; 34(3):395-399. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0741-1.
  38. North American Spine Society (NASS). Evidence-based Clinical Guidlines for Multidisciplinary Spine Care. Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy from Degenerative Disorders. 2010. https://www.spine.org/Portals/0/Assets/Downloads/ResearchClinicalCare/Guidelines/CervicalRadiculopathy.pdf.
  39. North American Spine Society (NASS). Clinician Lists. Choosing Wisely®. http://www.choosingwisely.org/clinician-lists/nass-emg-nerve-conduction-studies-to-determine-cause-of-spine-pain/. Released October 9, 2013.
  40. North American Spine Society (NASS). Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question. Choosing Wisely®. http://www.choosingwisely.org/clinician-lists/north-american-spine-society-advanced-imaging-of-spine-within-first-six-weeks-of-non-specific-acute-low-back-pain/. Released October 9, 2013.
  41. North American Spine Society (NASS). Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question. http://www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/north-american-spine-society/. 2014.
  42. Ozturk C, Karadereler S, Ornek I, Enercan M, Ganiyusufoglu K, Hamzaoglu A. The role of routine magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop. 2010;34(4):543-546. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0817-y.
  43. Pirker W, Katzenschlager R. Gait disorders in adults and the elderly: A clinical guide. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017;129(3-4):81-95. doi:10.1007/s00508-016-1096-4.
  44. Pomerantz SR. Myelography: Modern technique and indications. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016; 135:193-208.
  45. Radic JAE, Cochrane DD. Choosing wisely canada: pediatric neurosurgery recommendations. Paediatr Child Health. 2018;23(6):383-387. doi:10.1093/pch/pxy012.
  46. Rao D, Scuderi G, Scuderi C, Grewal R, et al. The use of imaging in management of patients with low back pain. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2018 Aug 24; 8:30.
  47. Roberts CC, Daffner RH, Weissman BN, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on metastatic bone disease. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(6):400-409. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015.
  48. Scoliosis Research Society (SRS). Conditions and treatments: Juvenille scholiosis. 2019.
  49. Sekula RF, Daffner RH, Quigley MR, et al. Exclusion of cervical spine instability in patients with blunt trauma with normal multidetector CT (MDCT) and radiography. Br J Neurosurg. 2008; 22(5):669-674. http://cranialdisorders.org/_pdfs/c-spine-multidetector-ct_2008.PDF.
  50. Shah LM, Salzman KL. Imaging of spinal metastatic disease. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011; 2011:769753.
  51. Starling A, Hernandez F, Hoxworth JM, et al. Sensitivity of MRI of the spine compared with CT myelography in orthostatic headache with CSF leak. Neurology. 2013;81(20):1789-1792. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000435555.13695.22.
  52. Strahle J, Muraszko KM, Kapurch J, Bapuraj JR, Garton HJL, Maher CO. Chiari malformation Type I and syrinx in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8(2):205-213. doi:10.3171/2011.5.PEDS1121.
  53. Strahle J, Smith BW, Martinez M, et al. The association between Chiari malformation Type I, spinal syrinx, and scoliosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. June 2015; 15(6):607-611. http://thejns.org/doi/pdf/10.3171/2014.11.PEDS14135. Retrieved March 29, 2018.
  54. Teoli D, Cabrero FR, Ghassemzadeh S. Lhermitte Sign. [Updated 2020 Oct 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493237/.
  55. Tehranzadeh J, Ashikyan O, Dascalos J, et al. Cervical spine instability in the course of rheumatoid arthritis - imaging methods. Reumatologia. 2017; 55(4):201–207.
  56. Timpone V, Patel SH. MRI of a syrinx: Is contrast material always necessary? Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 204:1082-1085. 10.2214/AJR.14.13310.
  57. Trenga AP, Singla A, Feger MA, et al. Patterns of congenital bony spinal deformity and associated neural anomalies on X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging. J Child Orthop. August 2016; 10(4):343-352. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0752-6. Retrieved March 29, 2018.
  58. Vilaca C, Orsini M, Leite MAA, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: What the neurologist should know. Neurol Int. 2016 Nov 2; 8(4):6330. doi: 10.4081/ni.2016.6330.
  59. Vitzthum H, Dalitz K. Analysis of five specific scores of cervical spondylogenic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. Dec. 2007; 16(12):2096-2103. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2140133/.
  60. Waly FJ, Abduljabbar FH, Fortin M, et al. Preoperative computed tomography myelography parameters as predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: Results of a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2017; 7(6):521–528. doi:10.1177/2192568217701101.
  61. White KK, Bompadre V, Goldberg MJ, et al. Best practices in the evaluation and treatment of foramen magnum stenosis in achondroplasia during infancy. Am J Med Genet. 2016;170(1):42-51. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37394.
  62. Ziu E, Mesfin FB. Cancer, Spinal Metastasis. StatPearls(Internet). April 23, 2019.  

Coding Section

Codes Number Description
CPT 72125

Computed tomographic, cervical spine, without contrast material


with contrast material


 without contrast material, followed by contrast material(s) and further sections

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive. 

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association technology assessment program (TEC) and other non-affiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association.  All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2019 Forward 

11/04/2021  Annual review, modifying language regarding neurological deficits, adding language regarding back pain in children, gait table, tumor imaging, toe walking, achondroplasia and MS criteria. Also updating description and references. 
11/12/2020  Annual review, expanded and revised policy verbiage for multiple different issues. Also updating description and references. 
11/22/2019                 NEW POLICY  
Complementary Content