General Inflammation Testing - CAM 205HB

Description 

Inflammatory response can occur due to tissue injury and/or various disorders, including arthritis, lupus, and infection. Acute phase reactants, such as serum C-reactive protein (CRP), are released in the acute phase response during inflammation and can be used to monitor inflammation. Inflammation may also be measured using the simple laboratory technique of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (Kushner, 2024).

For guidance on the use of CRP as a cardiac biomarker, please see policy CAM 193-Biomarkers for Myocardial Infarction and Chronic Heart Failure. For guidance on the use of CRP as a marker for acute pancreatitis, please see CAM 198-Pancreatic Enzyme Testing for Acute Pancreatitis.

Regulatory Status 
Testing of serum acute phase reactants and ESR is performed in laboratories meeting Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA) quality standards. The FDA has approved multiple tests for human CRP, including assays for conventional CRP, high sensitivity CRP (hsCRP), and cardiac CRP (cCRP). On Sept. 22, 2005, the FDA issued guidelines concerning the assessment of CRP (FDA, 2005). A search of the FDA Medical Devices database (FDA, 2018) on June 12, 2018, shows that the FDA has approved ESR systems from multiple companies, including the ESR Control -M Hematology Erythrocyte Sedimentation system (K972172) and the ESR Control -HC Hematology Erythrocyte Sedimentation system (K972170) by R & D Systems, the Seditainer Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate System (K953994) from Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems, the Westergren Dispette for ESR (K831195) by Ulster Scientific, and the Dade ESR Kit (K823368) from American Dade.

Policy  

Application of coverage criteria is dependent upon an individual’s benefit coverage at the time of the request. 

  1. Measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY for inflammatory conditions as specified in Note 1.
  2. For individuals without a diagnosed inflammatory condition, measurement of ESR is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY.
  3. Measurement of CRP and/or ESR during general exam without abnormal findings is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY.

 

NOTES:

Note 1: Coverage of CRP, ESR, CRP or ESR, or both CRP and ESR is designated based on the diagnosed or suspected inflammatory condition. Either conventional or high-sensitivity CRP testing are allowed methods of testing for CRP levels. When either CRP or ESR are allowed, CRP is the preferred biomarker.

Condition

Test Preference

Frequency of Testing

Acute and Chronic Urticaria

CRP or ESR

Not specified (NS)

Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis (AHO)

CRP

To confirm diagnosis; 2 to 3 days during the early therapeutic course; weekly until normalization (or a clear trend toward normalization is evident)

Acute Phase Inflammation

CRP

NS

Ankylosing Spondylitis

CRP or ESR

Regular interval use in patients with active symptoms

Arthritis

CRP and ESR

– 3 months initially; 6 – 12 months later

Castleman’s Disease

CRP

NS

General Inflammation

CRP

NS

Hodgkin Lymphoma

ESR

Every 3 to 6 months for 1 to 2 years; every 6 to 12 months for the next 3 years; annually thereafter

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

CRP and ESR

During initial assessment to exclude other diagnoses

Large Vessel Vasculitis (Giant Cell Arteritis, Takayasu Arteritis)

CRP and ESR

To confirm diagnosis; every 1 – 3 months during the first year; every 3 – 6 months thereafter

Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis

CRP or ESR

Regular interval use in patients with active symptoms

Polymyalgia Rheumatica

CRP or ESR

At initial diagnosis; every 3 months during long-term steroid therapy

Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJI)

CRP and ESR

NS

Rheumatoid Arthritis

CRP or ESR

Prior to treatment; every 1 – 3 months during active disease; annually when disease is inactive

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

CRP or ESR

At initial assessment; every 1 – 3 months during active disease; every 6 – 12 months during stable disease; during pregnancy

T-cell lymphomas

ESR

NS

TABLE OF TERMINOLOGY

Term

Definition

AAAAI

Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

AAFP 

American Academy of Family Physicians

AAOS

American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons

AAOS

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

ABIM

American Board of Internal Medicine

ABVD

Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine

ACAAI

American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

aCL

Anticardiolipin

ACPA

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies

ACR

American College of Rheumatology

ACR

American College of Radiology

ANA

Antinuclear antibodies

Anti-CCP

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides

Anti-dsDNA

Anti-double stranded DNA

Anti-β2-GPI

Anti-β2-glycoprotein I

aPL

Antiphospholipid antibodies

AS

Ankylosing spondylitis

ASCP

American Society for Clinical Pathology

ASCP

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies

AUC

Area under the curve

BHPR

British Health Professionals in Rheumatology

BSR 

British Society for Rheumatology

CBC

Complete blood count

cCRP

Cardiac C-reactive protein

CDAI

Clinical disease activity index

CHL

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma

CLIA

Clinical laboratory improvement act

CRA

Canadian Rheumatology Association

CRP

C-reactive protein

CTD

Connective tissue diseases

CVD

Cardiovascular disease

DAS

Disease activity score

DAS28

28-Joint disease activity score

DAS28-CRP

Disease activity score 28 C‐reactive protein

DAS28-ESR

Disease activity score with 28-joint counts - erythrocyte sedimentation rate

EDL

Essential In Vitro Diagnostics

EDTA

Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid

eGFR

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

EIA

Enzyme immunoassay

ENA

Extractable nuclear antigens

ESR

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

EULAR 

European League Against Rheumatism

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

GCA

Giant cell arteritis

HCSC

Health care service corporation

HL

Hodgkin lymphoma

hsCRP

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

IBD

Inflammatory bowel disease

IBS

Irritable bowel syndrome

ICSH

International Council for Standardization in Hematology

ISRT

Involved-site radiation therapy

IVD

In vitro diagnostics

JTFPP

Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters

LAC

Lupus anticoagulant

LDH

Lactate dehydrogenase

MCD

Multicentric Castleman Disease

MSIS

Musculoskeletal Infection Society

NA

Not applicable

NASH

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

NCCN

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

NICE

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

NPV

Negative predictive value

NS

Not specified

NSAID

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

PAS

Patient activity scale

PJI

Periprosthetic joint infections

PMR

Polymyalgia rheumatica

PPV

Positive predictive value

RA

Rheumatoid arthritis

RACGP

Rheumatoid Arthritis Working Group of The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

RAPID3

Routine assessment of patient index data 3

RD

Rheumatic disease

RDT

Rapid diagnostic test

RF

Rheumatoid factor

SAA

Spondylitis Association of America

SDAI

Simplified disease activity index

SIRS

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus

TSH

Thyroid-stimulating hormone

VASDA

Visual analog scale disease activity

VASQOL

VAS quality of life

WHO

World Health Organization

Rationale  
Conditions Associated with Acute Inflammatory Responses
Diseases most associated with an acute inflammatory response measured by C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) include arthritis, especially rheumatoid arthritis (RA), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), giant cell arteritis (GCA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), cardiovascular disease (CVD) (Kushner, 2024), and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (NCCN, 2024b). RA is a systemic polyarthritis that can lead to joint loss as well as tendon and ligament deformation to the point of affecting day-to-day living. The diagnosis of RA can be made in a patient “with inflammatory arthritis involving three or more joints, positive RF [rheumatoid factor] and/or anti-citrullinated peptide/protein antibody, disease duration of more than six weeks, and elevated CRP or ESR, but without evidence of diseases with similar clinical features” (Baker, 2024). PMR “is an inflammatory rheumatic condition characterized clinically by aching and morning stiffness about the shoulders, hip girdle, and neck” (Salvarani & Muratore, 2023a). PMR is frequently associated with GCA (also known as Horton disease), which is vasculitis of medium-to-large blood vessels and can include the aorta and cranial arteries. Cranial arteritis can lead to permanent vision loss. An estimated 40% 
– 50% of patients with GCA also suffer from PMR whereas 15% of all PMR patients are also diagnosed with GCA. Due to inflammation of the aorta and aortic branches, aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection can occur in patients with GCA (Salvarani & Muratore, 2023b). In both PMR and GCA, ESR and CRP levels are typically elevated. SLE “is a complex autoimmune disease with chronic relapsing-remitting course and variable manifestations leading a spectrum from mild mucocutaneous to devastating, life-threatening illness… Epigenetic modifications mediate the effect of the environment on immunologic responses, eventually leading to an inflammatory, autoimmune, multi-systemic disease characterized by autoantibody production and tissue injury” (Gergianaki & Bertsias, 2018). Since patients with SLE can be prone to infection, ESR and CRP may be used in monitoring inflammation (Kushner, 2024). CVD is a very common inflammatory disorder in the United States. Although serum CRP is a non-specific inflammatory marker and is not a causative agent of CVD, serum CRP can be used as a biomarker for CVD (Black et al., 2004; Kushner, 2024). Hodgkin lymphoma accounts for 10% of lymphomas and is characterized as a B-cell lymphoma “containing a minority of neoplastic cells (Reed-Sternberg cells and their variants) in an inflammatory background” (Aster & Pozdnyakova, 2022). ESR is elevated in HL, and an ESR ≥50 is considered as an “early-stage unfavorable factor” (NCCN, 2024b). 

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a common laboratory method used to monitor general inflammation. ESR is used to analyze many different conditions, including RA, SLE, arteritis, PMR (Kushner, 2024; Wu et al., 2010). The simple Westergren method of ESR consists of measuring the distance a blood sample travels in a tube within one hour. The International Council for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH) established a calibration reference to this method using citrate-diluted samples. Automated ESR methods have been established; however, some of these analyzers use different dilution solutions, such as EDTA, rather than citrate. EDTA is commonly used as an anticoagulant in hematology measurements whereas the use of citrate is less prevalent. Horsti et al. (2010) compared blood samples from 200 patients using the traditional Westergren method versus an EDTA-based method. Their data has an R2 value of only 0.72 and 55 subjects had a difference of over 30%, clearly indicating that ESR is significantly affected by sample preparation methods (Horsti et al., 2010). ESR can also be affected by red blood cell morphology, ambient conditions (such as high room temperature or tilting of the ESR tube), anemia, renal disease, obesity, heart failure, and hypofibrinogenemia (Kushner, 2024; Taylor & Deleuran, 2024).

More, ESR may be affected by noninflammatory factors, thus reducing its specificity for inflammatory processes. Noninflammatory biological factors and environmental conditions can increase a sample’s observed ESR. If the serum sample contains elevated concentrations of ions or charged proteins, an elevated ESR may occur; for example, an increase in positively charged plasma proteins could result in agglutination of erythrocytes within a sample for rapid sedimentation (Hale et al., 2019).

The ICSH established a Working Group to investigate the ESR methodology used in laboratories; the findings of this working group were published in 2017. Data from over 6000 laboratories on four different continents was examined. Of the laboratories included in the study, only 28% used the “gold standard” Westergren method exclusively (i.e. the method with the established validation by the ICSH) “while 72% of sites used modified or alternate methods.” The data obtained from the new methodologies could deviate from the Westergren method by up to 142% and could differ “from each other of up to 42%.” The ICSH released recommendations based up the results of these studies. One such recommendation for labs using the non-Westergren method of ESR is to “consider adding an interpretative comment to every result stating that ‘This result was obtained with an ESR instrument that is not based on the standard Westergren method. The sensitivity and specificity of this method for various disease states may be different from the standard Westergren method’” (Kratz et al., 2017).

Besides the Westergren method, other methods have been developed to measure ESR including the Zeta sedimentation ratio, Wintrobe’s method, and micro-ESR. In a validation study, Shaikh discussed the use of the Ves-Matic Cube 30 analyzer to address the drawbacks of the Westergren method such as contamination risk, the significant blood volume required, and increased duration of analysis. A strong positive correlation was observed between Westergren and Ves-Matic methods with Spearman’s coefficient of 0.97. The study concluded that Ves-Matic Cube 30 analyzer can be used in high workload clinical settings for ESR measurement as the generated results were in concordance with those from the Westergren method. 

C-reactive Protein (CRP)
C-reactive protein (CRP) was first discovered in the early twentieth century when it was isolated in a co-precipitation reaction with the pneumococcal C polysaccharide. The polysaccharide component bound by CRP later was identified to be phosphocholine. Since then, studies have shown that CRP can bind ligands other than bacterial cell wall components. During an acute inflammatory response, hepatocytes can upregulate CRP synthesis more than 1,000-fold. The increase in serum CRP “after tissue injury or infection suggests that it contributes to host defense and that it is part of the innate immune response” (Black et al., 2004). Determining CRP concentration and fluctuations in plasma CRP can be useful in monitoring inflammatory response; however, what dictates “normal” CRP levels is of debate since CRP concentrations can vary considerably between individuals, people groups, and laboratory testing methodology. The units used to denote CRP concentrations also vary between laboratories (Kushner, 2024).